[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Meeting Snowden in Princeton

To: [email protected]
Subject: Meeting Snowden in Princeton
From: [email protected] (Seth)
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 21:22:26 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Mon, 04 May 2015 12:25:34 -0700, Juan <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I find this unbelievable.
>
>
> 	Are you saying the alleged facts you listed are not true?
> 	(that's a possibility)

They're true to the best extent that I've been able to determine. If some  
can identify errors please make them known so the timeline can be  
corrected.

> 	But if you assmue all that is true, then my view fits nicely.
> 	He didn't bothered with 'opsec' because he didn't need to.

That's exactly what I'm driving at. It's hard not to consider the  
conclusion based on the facts presented in the timeline.

References:
- Meeting Snowden in Princeton
  - From: [email protected] (Juan)
- Meeting Snowden in Princeton
  - From: [email protected] (Mirimir)
- Meeting Snowden in Princeton
  - From: [email protected] (Juan)
- Meeting Snowden in Princeton
  - From: [email protected] (Mirimir)
- Meeting Snowden in Princeton
  - From: [email protected] (Seth)
- Meeting Snowden in Princeton
  - From: [email protected] (Juan)

Prev by Date: Meeting Snowden in Princeton
Next by Date: Jim Bell vindicated
Previous by thread: Meeting Snowden in Princeton
Next by thread: Meeting Snowden in Princeton
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread