[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[tor-talk] Tor -> VPN Clarification

To: [email protected]
Subject: [tor-talk] Tor -> VPN Clarification
From: [email protected] (Mirimir)
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 20:19:11 -0700
In-reply-to: <CAD2Ti2-32qPOMg+rGnQ=ph23UN08CN0ojsX5bDOzYBhCs-nbiw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAD2Ti2-32qPOMg+rGnQ=ph23UN08CN0ojsX5bDOzYBhCs-nbiw@mail.gmail.com>

On 01/30/2015 06:48 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Mirimir <[email protected]> wrote:
>> JonDoNym / JAP
> 
> I'm seeing references to this tool pop up recently in various
> places. Keep in mind the controversie from years ago
> and read the label on the tin carefully. That's not to say
> it's not fit for use once you understand its fitness.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_Anon_Proxy

I replied on tor-talk.

References:
- [tor-talk] Tor -> VPN Clarification
  - From: [email protected] (grarpamp)

Prev by Date: Cypherpunk Politics
Next by Date: www.nsa-observer.net
Previous by thread: [tor-talk] Tor -> VPN Clarification
Next by thread: Nafeez's Google History lacks US Customs & Secret Service
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread