[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Cryptography Intellectual Property: Formalities of Cypherpunk
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Cryptography Intellectual Property: Formalities of Cypherpunk
- From: [email protected] (grarpamp)
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:50:45 -0500
- In-reply-to: <3932827.c1u7vRUG6D@lapuntu>
- References: <CAD2Ti29owLs2tqvn5+VnFJjgtqxGd7fBye5Y9W4=4eUqx9H82w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <3932827.c1u7vRUG6D@lapuntu>
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:34 PM, rysiek <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dnia wtorek, 13 stycznia 2015 09:39:06 Robert Hettinga pisze:
>> If itâ??s encrypted, and I have the key, itâ??s my property. Thatâ??s it.
>
> The question is not about encrypted materials, but about encryption algorithms
> and tools, as far as I understand.
As in OP, it is. ,,,the ideas, expressed, and tuning
their license etc to cypherpunk the same way gpl
tunes to their vision of 'freedom'. Hessla theirs, etc.
Robert could be viewed as that key is itself the
definition of one plain answer to the question.