[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Rant on BSD vs GPL was [Good ol' BSD vs. GPL]
- To: grarpamp <[email protected]>
- Subject: Rant on BSD vs GPL was [Good ol' BSD vs. GPL]
- From: [email protected] (Georgi Guninski)
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 14:47:14 +0200
- Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
- In-reply-to: <CAD2Ti28S1tihe3xJqmaBbwsfZme=13b4KBCPQ+9qXo+-eRSMbQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]$> <CAHWD2rLykCccGA9JhCV_d=Dz+_SaT4=pp-DEgGJ+tK1EPSEAmg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD2Ti2_2E0x=sg2gSHvwgqiu6FG2PcuFwr6G8RvY9_oL-9GBUA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]$> <CAD2Ti28S1tihe3xJqmaBbwsfZme=13b4KBCPQ+9qXo+-eRSMbQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 07:00:24AM -0500, grarpamp wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Georgi Guninski <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Building just the kernel with clang is likely possibly, but
> > bare kernel is not a distro.
> >
> > Till recently, I believe one couldn't build desktop
> > environment only with clang, might be wrong on this.
>
> As in the links, the entire FreeBSD kernel, base,
> and most of it's ~25,000 ports build with clang. X,
> browsers, whatever. The others are not as far along.
> Not bad considering clang itself is a "till recently".
Thanks, probably i should stop trolling bsd for gcc so far,
except for historical reasons that RMS & co gave them the
toolchain to get started and be alive.
I suppose _some_ of the ~25,000 ports _don't build_ with clang,
giving me a short opportunity of trolling -- you still need
gcc for _all_ ports?