[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Security/Privacy Tradeoff - Dave DeWalt of Mandiant
- To: Travis Biehn <[email protected]>, [email protected]
- Subject: Security/Privacy Tradeoff - Dave DeWalt of Mandiant
- From: [email protected] (aestetix)
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:05:41 -0800
- In-reply-to: <CAKtE3zdOO4SvQf1bJWAjEspVWbvC=bpFbQV3h99mho-XfC4P-w@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAKtE3zdOO4SvQf1bJWAjEspVWbvC=bpFbQV3h99mho-XfC4P-w@mail.gmail.com>
I will simply say that most people making speeches about privacy these
days don't actually understand what privacy is or why it's important.
On 2/13/15 9:08 PM, Travis Biehn wrote:
> From the article
> http://www.cbsnews.com/news/obamas-cybersecurity-plan-why-the-government-cant-protect-us/
>
> "Dave DeWalt, CEO of security firm Mandiant, a participant in Friday's
> summit, hopes that fear of privacy invasion won't get in the way of the
> work that needs to get done. He pointed to the way the way public
> backlash to government surveillance programs revealed by former NSA
> contractor Edward Snowden stymied previous efforts to effectively open
> the lines of communication.
>
> "This balance between privacy and security ebbs and flows and
> unfortunately that was a huge setback -- a setback to the tune of
> several years," he said.
> "
>
> This is the first that I've ever heard of a tradeoff between privacy and
> security in the context of 'cyber security'.
> It's interesting to see this common trope for justifying widespread
> erosion of privacy in meatspace applied to 'cyber', where it is even
> more egregiously wrong.
>
> Travis
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 513 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20150213/f7cbbf07/attachment.sig>