Learning from dpr mistakes

[tbiehn@gmail.com (Travis Biehn)]

The feds probably had enough to convict even without his laptops'
contents...

But yeah, monitoring the environment is a solid idea, as is CPU <-> RAM
encrypted pipeline.

Internet access is usually the first thing that's cut. (Unless your
attacker knows you use it as a trigger, or maybe possibly thought about
using it as a trigger.)

Travis
On Feb 10, 2015 7:28 PM, "David Honig" <dahonig@cox.net> wrote:

>
> A number of public reviews of DPR's infosec mistakes have been published.
>
>
> I think a strong solution to the 'tackled in library' defects would be to
> have:
>
> 1) program to notice his magic bracelet is not near
> 2) program to notice that vid cam is not a head but a chaotic scene
>
> #2 is particularly easy without extra hardware (ca. 2015)  You'll have to
> switch it off when you
> visit the loo.
>
> And of course, things like 'back to wall facing forward' would have been
> helpful.
> Claustophilia is a useful trait.
>
>
>
>
>  I wish to God these calculations could be done by a
> steam engine,â?? Babbage complained
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20150210/dff1104e/attachment.html>