[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Privacy advocates resign over facial recognition plans
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Privacy advocates resign over facial recognition plans
- From: [email protected] (Juan)
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 18:07:35 -0300
- In-reply-to: <2141771.o8rmPJaZR7@lapuntu>
- References: <CAD2Ti28gy80q=PQn=UM=W9sP_14U5JggEZpmF-rL+7Kj4G4k2Q@mail.gmail.com> <1442424.xVskXVQWxY@lapuntu> <[email protected]> <2141771.o8rmPJaZR7@lapuntu>
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 22:50:27 +0200
rysiek <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dnia wtorek, 11 sierpnia 2015 17:43:58 Juan pisze:
> > On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 22:29:38 +0200
> >
> > rysiek <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Dnia wtorek, 11 sierpnia 2015 17:21:02 Juan pisze:
> > > > On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 21:15:26 +0100
> > > >
> > > > Cathal Garvey <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Forcing those in power *not* to look back at us, and granting
> > > > > ourselves greater ability to visualise power's actions, are
> > > > > not mutually exclusive goals. We should be doing both,
> > > > > including methods to hide ourselves and to better monitor and
> > > > > hold accountable those in power.
> > > >
> > > > yet more pro-establishment propaganda.
> > > >
> > > > sure, the social democrat and statist clown garvey is
> > > > going
> > > >
> > > > to 'hold accountable' his masters by voting and 'encrypting' his
> > > >
> > > > mail...
> > >
> > > Thang $DEITY for Juan, who will soon (I'm sure!) enlighten all of
> > > us with a silver bullet to solve all social, political and any
> > > and all other kinds of problems!
> >
> > Your reply is meaningles rysiek. Well it's obvious you don't
> > have any argument and just want to believe in unrealistic
> > bullshit.
> >
> > You, too, let me know when you guys start 'watching' and
> > 'holding accountable' your 'representatives' aka your
> > masters.
>
> So far, I'd say I'm doing a decent job at that.
lol - except you aren't.
And sorry this is a mailing list. If you have something to say
say it here.
Your links get ignored - as they should.
>
> Exhibit A:
> 1. http://rys.io/en/59
> 2. http://rys.io/en/62
> 3. http://rys.io/en/70
>
> Exhibit B:
> 1. http://rys.io/en/94
> 2. http://rys.io/en/109
>
> Your point?
>