[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[cryptography] Email encryption for the wider public

To: Henry Augustus Chamberlain <[email protected]>
Subject: [cryptography] Email encryption for the wider public
From: [email protected] (stef)
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:57:56 +0200
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-reply-to: <CABU-GB2xq75NjaqV-XD25VQq8cBaQZ_cYcO9fx5NrSzM+eV6ig@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABU-GB37qpwUuTtK15VmykzuR4_-AVQvSFUYXO=W8VC3J2hEFA@mail.gmail.com> <CAD2Ti29NreOO75KPNE3a5P6Fg-A7+O1H4NLRRQM4t7_QAwebaA@mail.gmail.com> <CABU-GB2xq75NjaqV-XD25VQq8cBaQZ_cYcO9fx5NrSzM+eV6ig@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 09:06:53AM +0200, Henry Augustus Chamberlain wrote:
> currently able to use email encryption at all! I think both concerns
> are fair, and both are worth trying to solve.

let me summarize (and ask you to reread and understand) grapamps response to
you: email is dead.

-- 
otr fp: https://www.ctrlc.hu/~stef/otr.txt

Follow-Ups:
- [cryptography] Email encryption for the wider public
  - From: [email protected] (Peter Gutmann)

References:
- [cryptography] Email encryption for the wider public
  - From: [email protected] (grarpamp)

Prev by Date: killing RC4 in Chrome
Next by Date: [cryptography] Email encryption for the wider public
Previous by thread: [cryptography] Email encryption for the wider public
Next by thread: [cryptography] Email encryption for the wider public
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread