[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Cryptography, backdoors and the Second Amendment

To: [email protected]
Subject: Cryptography, backdoors and the Second Amendment
From: [email protected] (Steve Furlong)
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 20:24:44 -0400
Cc: cpunks <[email protected]>, Cryptography Mailing List <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <1412897789.3376891.177247101.2F9CFC02@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <1412897789.3376891.177247101.2F9CFC02@webmail.messagingengine.com>

On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Alfie John <[email protected]> wrote:

> As the US State Department classifies cryptography as a munition,
> shouldn't the use of cryptography be protected under the 2nd Amendment?

You're expecting consistency, logic, or even honesty from a government?
Your naivete is so /cute/!

-- 
Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet. -- Arnaud-Amaury, 1209
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20141009/21b4381c/attachment.html>

Follow-Ups:
- Cryptography, backdoors and the Second Amendment
  - From: [email protected] (Sampo Syreeni)

References:
- Cryptography, backdoors and the Second Amendment
  - From: [email protected] (Alfie John)

Prev by Date: Cryptography, backdoors and the Second Amendment
Next by Date: Cryptography, backdoors and the Second Amendment
Previous by thread: Cryptography, backdoors and the Second Amendment
Next by thread: Cryptography, backdoors and the Second Amendment
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread