[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

is truecrypt dead?

To: [email protected]
Subject: is truecrypt dead?
From: [email protected] (Lance Cottrell)
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 06:44:32 -0700
Cc: Cypherpunks <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>

On May 30, 2014, at 4:56 AM, [email protected] wrote:

> 
> | 
> | Could this non-notice be a Lavabit/Silent Circle type announcement/warning?
> | 
> 
> We need, somehow, a safe word for such projects.  Presumably one
> that is triggered by a failed keep-alive.  This has been discussed
> before variously, but it may be an idea whose time has come.  Design
> will require choices between false alarms and silent failure.
> 
> --dan
> 

A deadman switch for NSL alerts would make for an interesting case. Would a judge rule that you had â??spokenâ?? about the NSL by failing to send the keep-alive messages, thus compelling you to continuously speak the lie that you have not received one?

--
Lance Cottrell
[email protected]

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4877 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20140530/0486c9b0/attachment.bin>

Follow-Ups:
- is truecrypt dead?
  - From: [email protected] (Cathal (phone))
- is truecrypt dead?
  - From: [email protected] (Alfie John)
- is truecrypt dead?
  - From: [email protected] (jim bell)
- is truecrypt dead?
  - From: [email protected] (Juan)

References:
- Fwd: is truecrypt dead?
  - From: [email protected] ([email protected])

Prev by Date: Fwd: is truecrypt dead?
Next by Date: is truecrypt dead?
Previous by thread: Fwd: is truecrypt dead?
Next by thread: is truecrypt dead?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread