[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
See???
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 04:10:19PM -0800, jim bell wrote:
> From: Robert Hettinga <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>Â
>
> On Mar 6, 2014, at 1:29 PM, jim bell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> I *told* you I wasn't Sanjuro.
>
> >But, the *do* want to offer *bounties* on anyone who harms Satoshi, so theyâ??ve got *that* goinâ?? for â??em.
> >:-)
> >Cheers,
> >RAH
>
> Clearly, this points to the need to expand the AP/AM implementations to include 'indefinite targets': AP targets whose names aren't known at the time the donation is made. Â And, even targets who really don't even exist at the time the donation is made. Â Presumably, Satoshi is still alive and well, thus nobody out there (yet) has harmed him. Â Somebody might want to put money (BTC) on anyone who would do so.
> Â I alluded to this at the time I wrote the AP essay, with my reference to using AP to attack car thieves. Â
> Â Â Â Â Â Jim Bell
I think you just made Satoshi Nakamoto the most well protected person in
history.
Well played psy-ops my friend.
That's almost as good as the hypothetical game big (insert your boogeyman
here) might be playing with Putin to make him think Bitcoin is a NSA/CIA
operation to ruin the ruble.
I'd rather be a Satoshi than a Vladimir right now.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' [email protected]
7 elements earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soul grid.coop
Never pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel,
nor try buy a hacker who makes money by the megahash