[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[cryptography] The next gen P2P secure email solution
- To: [email protected], [email protected], grarpamp <[email protected]>, [email protected]
- Subject: [cryptography] The next gen P2P secure email solution
- From: [email protected] (Cathal (phone))
- Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 02:45:40 +0100
- Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
- In-reply-to: <1963792268.217779.1401672836775.JavaMail.www@wwinf8308>
- References: <CAD2Ti28MwGU_5gLxMUG61En6NT059rWP=Qbk1O74Vc8hTCrLGw@mail.gmail.com> <CAEvNM8m58fOthCbONp84491s=c27wBDefPpNo1wA4h5oa+evTA@mail.gmail.com> <1538308832.40108.1398193110797.JavaMail.www@wwinf8228> <1674207.VbjJNtGabs@lap> <CAD2Ti28Wvwjc7_RD+1jOcWeYvF-9qoEWZeboX-uDL3RKShZ-dg@mail.gmail.com> <772145240.115968.1400157383527.JavaMail.www@wwinf8308> <CAD2Ti29afVNDp2KCyxrmOVp0AEWUpfB99B0brv5pN0fQj+wqCw@mail.gmail.com> <438532216.290372.1400197775126.JavaMail.www@wwinf8314> <CAD2Ti2_LH7M16Vw0MXQEYt3-AimvTokpg10fkPc48LS3NVM5zQ@mail.gmail.com> <1194846483.156635.1400234437146.JavaMail.www@wwinf8226> <CAD2Ti2-qzh-vkV9PfM_sa-QG+-3t_mDu5vN3yse57vHk74_4Bw@mail.gmail.com> <1963792268.217779.1401672836775.JavaMail.www@wwinf8308>
What about streaming, which is increasingly used to hold power to account in real time? Or other rich, necessarily large media which needs to *get out fast*? Big media isn't always frivolous. Even frivolity is important, and a mixnet without fun is gonna be a small mixnet.
On 2 June 2014 02:33:56 GMT+01:00, [email protected] wrote:
>> Message du 01/06/14 20:37
>> De : "grarpamp"
>>
>> In May 2014 someone wrote:
>> >> > p2p is no panacea, it doesn't scale
>> >>
>> >> I believe it could. Even if requiring super aggregating
>> >> nodes of some sort. Layers of service of the whole
>> >> DHT space. More research is surely required.
>>
>> > It is not possible to have fast p2p unless:
>> > - Cable networks collaborate by increasing bandwidth 7 to 8 times
>>
>> My references to scale were not intended to be about...
>> bulk bandwidth across such networks (for example, right
>> now, I2P and Tor are doing well enough to see very low
>> quality video between their hidden nodes if you get a lucky
>> path, and well enough for moving large files around in non
>> realtime). ie: the nodes have bandwidth available.
>>
>
>We all wish privacy, not necessarily 4k videos. The current bandwidth
>can provide for 4k videos and also privacy, no matter if a littler
>slower, for a little chat, work and file transfers.
>
>Except if you are into media production or warez, the current bandwidth
>already does the trick for all the rest.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20140602/acfbb795/attachment.html>