[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Cryptography] propaganda on "hurdles for law enforcement"
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: [Cryptography] propaganda on "hurdles for law enforcement"
- From: [email protected] (Juan)
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 19:23:18 -0300
- In-reply-to: <CAD2Ti2_mdy7kbt=zEDGvfTM5fKoHr=8kTHiZcXaVfFZmVNyO7w@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAD2Ti2-may7Yzp3QW2SX+t0LdbQNtHY9zAkGD_q=cWdTZktnww@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <1574390.DTMde0LM7b@lapuntu> <[email protected]> <CAD2Ti2_mdy7kbt=zEDGvfTM5fKoHr=8kTHiZcXaVfFZmVNyO7w@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:57:11 -0400
grarpamp <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Juan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > You whine because (you say) I don't propose a
> > better solution. Actually, telling you to stop doing
> > something that is counterprductive is in itself a better proposal
>
> Anarchists are interesting... because they have an affinity towards
> nothing, they're resistant towards everything, and proposing anything.
> Perhaps that is worthy of certain degree of respects.
You know, apart from the theoretical/logical (and moral) case for
anarchism, I also have a less principled remark to make.
Actually it's a rather pragmatic, 'realistic' and utilitarian remark :
I wouldn't object too much to reformism/gradualism IF it really worked.
But if anything, and as matter of cold hard fact, reformism seems to
work against freedom.