{}coin: good enough for election politics?

[rysiek@hackerspace.pl (rysiek)]

Dnia piÄ?tek, 24 stycznia 2014 11:56:25 James A. Donald pisze:
> On 2014-01-24 11:18, Juan Garofalo wrote:
> > 	3, 2, 1, A conservative starts to pretend that 'private' censorship is
> > 	not
> > 
> > censorship!
> 
> If different corporations each had their own ideas on what should be
> censored, private censorship would not be censorship.

That, and one more condition: that we could choose different kinds of services 
and products independently. Unfortunately, different kinds of services and 
products are bundled in ways making it impossible for us to make informed 
choices, let alone choose them independently.

For instance, if I go to food chain X, I only get soda Y. This is a very 
simple example of a huge problem, seen everywhere, esp. in the ICT sector. And 
it will only get more evident if net neutrality is not enforced.

> The problem is that we hear one voice through a thousand megaphones.

For once, we agree.

-- 
Pozdr
rysiek
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20140130/8c6843cb/attachment.sig>