[OT] Note to new-ish subscribers: you joined a mailing list, not a "group". (fwd)

[wahspilihp@gmail.com (Philip Shaw)]

On 21 Jan 2014, at 12:47 , J.A. Terranson <measl@mfn.org> wrote:

> Telecom/NSA/*retroactive immunity* ring a bell? 

Retroactive acquittal is relatively OK - it is a good thing when applied to the people, for example people have been campaigning for a long time to get all British sodomy convictions quashed even though everyone has now been released, so we more or less have to accept that it *can* be used to clear government agents too, even if politically we shouldnâ??t approve (at least in specific cases). (For criminal matters, in many jurisdictions the government can simply refuse to prosecute cases against its agents and private prosecutions arenâ??t permitted in some places, so it doesnâ??t create any new danger to the public.)

Retroactive indictment is the problem, and is far more dangerous.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 243 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20140121/cb8b3759/attachment.sig>