hacker != cracker (Re: Swartz, Weev & radical libertarian lexicon)

[adam@cypherspace.org (Adam Back)]

How about a disclosure post-mortem, cant be sued, jailed or assets frozen
then.  Its maybe an interesting thought if there are some quite old or
life-threated medical problems people who coincidentally are subject to gags
or self-imposed silence for personal safety for things they strongly feel
should be in the public knowledge..

Adam

On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 08:04:44PM -0600, brian carroll wrote:
>   coderman wrote:
>   Ã?
>
>     i am exploring a gambit for disclosure post-statute-of-limitations,
>     but even this protection seems meager and risky.
>
>   (that is a beautiful idea)