Jacob Appelbaum in Germany

[juan.g71@gmail.com (Juan Garofalo)]

--On Saturday, January 04, 2014 10:55 AM +1000 "James A. Donald"
<jamesd@echeque.com> wrote:

> On 2014-01-04 07:04, Juan Garofalo wrote:
>> If you believed in the typical conservative  "my house, my rules"
>> garbage, why would you post in this  mailing where people are supposed
>> to subscribe to anarchistic and anti-intelectual 'property' views?
> 
> Schwarz was not charged with violating other people's intellectual
> property, but other people's physical property.
> 
> He needed killing, just as much as Martin Trayvon did, for much the same
> reasons as Martin Trayvon needed killing.
> 
> If an anti state protester, protest state power, not property.  If you
> are protesting property, you are a pro state protestor
> 
> Which is why Schwarz thought he was part of the powerful, and thought
> those he harmed were part of the powerless.  Because he was striking at
> physical property, not intellectual property.
> 



	1) that he wasn't striking at intellectual property is your (false) side
of the story.

	2) the physical property of the state and its accomplices isn't legitimate
property, or rather, it isn't *their* property. 

	
	"He needed killing, just as much as Martin Trayvon did"

	may the one who needs killing is you.


	




>