[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
The Intimidation Factor: How a Surveillance State Can Affect What You Read in Professional Publications
- To: cpunks <[email protected]>, liberationtech <[email protected]>
- Subject: The Intimidation Factor: How a Surveillance State Can Affect What You Read in Professional Publications
- From: [email protected] (coderman)
- Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 21:15:39 -0800
- In-reply-to: <CAJVRA1Sdb_kqFoS6wh0F=3j1+SaF_xBkGPZWFwu-q6nidR55Vg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAJVRA1Sdb_kqFoS6wh0F=3j1+SaF_xBkGPZWFwu-q6nidR55Vg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 9:11 PM, coderman <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...
> does anyone have details on the nature of the pressure to censor in this case?
only other information from RISKS digest:
"""
Surveillance leads to censorship? [PGN retitling]
Robert Schaefer <[email protected]>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 15:40:28 -0500
In this December's IEEE *Computer* magazine, in the column titled "The
Intimidation Factor: How a Surveillance State Can Affect What You Read in
Professional Publications", Hal Berghel says that he was forced to pull a
screenshot of a powerpoint slide Edward Snowden leaked to The Washington
Post.
The screenshot appeared in the his July column printed version but was
removed from the IEEE digital library version. Berghel writes: "Pull up a
chair and let me tell you a story..."
"""