[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Gox
- To: Lodewijk andré de la porte <[email protected]>
- Subject: Gox
- From: [email protected] (Troy Benjegerdes)
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 23:12:58 -0600
- Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
- In-reply-to: <CAHWD2r+vQzK2dVZNeZV+U-Wx739uGdPhstBiVSpNQELOfY=okg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CADJYzxJhYo71dNYt9HDJngbcm5xa-w+=ahEMDLgAo-2A3q54Jw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAHWD2rJ_sO7uU+r5c2wPwva3=wXmctLQdgt4gbsvObSkwrVmHA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFd=HCdRp9euEOciOCkmmSfmLeM-D+mG5f2pzMZ-PWXFSpqhvg@mail.gmail.com> <CE9A1DA4B192616532BA36C7@F74D39FA044AA309EAEA14B9> <CAFd=HCeayRgLt-0WrgGTkV_WKYq5qmG7uLd9K9mMv9XdH_b=wA@mail.gmail.com> <B8214B6FF4A1920C69712CCD@F74D39FA044AA309EAEA14B9> <CAHWD2r+vQzK2dVZNeZV+U-Wx739uGdPhstBiVSpNQELOfY=okg@mail.gmail.com>
> > > code security-wise and push it live than it is to create code that is
> > > actually properly implemented for a banking environment to handle both
> > the
> > > large amounts of money and the quite serious number of attacks that will
> > > take place once the amount of money available is established.
> > >
> > > In a competitive environment, the folks who take short cuts will save
> > > money in the short term, and thus will be more likely to pick up users
> > > than a more expensive equivalent that actually did the security
> > correctly.
> >
> > And in the long term they will be out of business.
> >
>
> Or not. If it were up to most regulators, definitely not.
>
> Mtgox was never in a highly competitive environment. If it were it wouldn't
> have been on top so steadily with so little improvements in service
> rendered.
The service rendered was trade volume. It seemed to do that quite well.
>
> > Although that's not the whole picture. In this case, a different
> > problem
> > is that people are using a *centralized* exchange as a bank to keep their
> > supposedly *decentralized* e-money.
>
>
> This is offtopic to be honest. Whoever needed a money that was totally
> centralized, and why does he/she think Bitcoin is it? It's much much much
> more decentralized than any other currency. The fact that it's not useless
> now is what sets it apart from things like the LibertyDollar, so I'd say
> it's working just fine. Can't stand this sort of underinformed bullshitting.
I'd argue that centralized systems provide, on averge, a larger anonymity
set and privacy in the majority of cases than decentralized ones. In particular
exchanges that everyone believes are 'incompetent' are a wonderful place to
get a lot of cheap plausible deniability by making everyone else that uses
it pay for it when the house of cards falls down.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' [email protected]
7 elements earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soul grid.coop
Never pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel,
nor try buy a hacker who makes money by the megahash