[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
consent and trust? Oh... but we are ABOVE the law
- To: rysiek <[email protected]>
- Subject: consent and trust? Oh... but we are ABOVE the law
- From: [email protected] (Lodewijk andré de la porte)
- Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 07:44:41 +0100
- Cc: [email protected]
- In-reply-to: <1853820.izOuAs2Vgz@lapuntu>
- References: <CAEm6KbJxU2myFqtpbMYsyp6+Ot-BnqPemL56W=1EX56yvD1YUA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <1853820.izOuAs2Vgz@lapuntu>
On Dec 23, 2014 5:16 PM, "rysiek" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> And secondly, it's a simple matter of resources. If a LEA officer can do
this
> at their whim on any given day and on any given house, they're going to do
> this *a lot*. But filling out paperwork, even if it's gonna be
rubber-stamped
> by a friendly judge, still adds quite a bit of work to the process. Here,
the
> thinking is along the lines of "make it ever more costly, in terms of
time,
> work and money, and they will use it less".
This is far from good defence. It might make a difference in the low value
target spread, until form letters make it possible to obtain permission on
a larger scale. Form letters make it into an "all you can eat" model.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20141224/e6558c77/attachment.html>