[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Surveillance
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Surveillance
- From: [email protected] (Juan Garofalo)
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 23:38:27 -0300
- In-reply-to: <CA+cU71mGDQ+XVvUdFPEosoaCY5E6a_cp=jnK5vpGMmarsd=TFA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <DFD5FB36952E6F3FACECCA89@F74D39FA044AA309EAEA14B9> <CA+cU71mGDQ+XVvUdFPEosoaCY5E6a_cp=jnK5vpGMmarsd=TFA@mail.gmail.com>
--On Monday, September 30, 2013 10:08 PM -0400 Tom Ritter <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On 30 September 2013 21:45, Juan Garofalo <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Am I right in assuming that the US is the only country who has
>> its own subjects PLUS a good deal of the world under close
>> surveillance?
>
> I would say you are incorrect. The UK and the US cooperate very, very
> closely.
Yes, sorry, that was a silly overlook on my part =)
Also, I see the anglo-american government plus a couple of its provinces
like australia and new zealand (oh, and canada) as virtually a single
entity...
So, the question should be : apart from the anglo-americans, and perhaps
the chinese, is there any other cyber police state out there?
Likewise, the Echelon/Five Eyes program is a publicly
> documented SIGINT sharing program
> (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON).
>
> -tom
>