[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[cryptography] The Compromised Internet

To: Eugen Leitl <[email protected]>
Subject: [cryptography] The Compromised Internet
From: [email protected] (coderman)
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 23:28:06 -0700
Cc: cpunks <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <CAJVRA1Q3Gf_j8qsrKdkbX2qaUxUi0SDsbEq5yO47-EiAyKShfA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]> <CAC7JQK3M-E5GA_NvLzfUakaeD3oxeszfRSof+6E6jNAJLJ5uuw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAD2Ti28JN08zWY+aNtOhFUVPQt_=yjkU5a8qW5+6RVXB7U9hSw@mail.gmail.com> <CADJYzxKzdt10N-38AcNMCbn5GqvfT039Uq41qC8ZWQtoJ-XkQA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAJVRA1Q3Gf_j8qsrKdkbX2qaUxUi0SDsbEq5yO47-EiAyKShfA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:23 PM, coderman <[email protected]> wrote:
>... today what you want is multiples of MIMO QAM channels.
> you _can_ achieve gigabits over miles; we have the technology!

i used to be a free space optics fan.  but they're old skewl,
inefficient, subject to the whims of nature and certainly not
multi-path friendly!

radio is where it's at., and software defined radio is how you speak it.

EOM

References:
- The Unbreakable Cipher
  - From: [email protected] (John Young)
- The Compromised Internet
  - From: [email protected] (John Young)
- [cryptography] The Compromised Internet
  - From: [email protected] (grarpamp)
- [cryptography] The Compromised Internet
  - From: [email protected] (Rich Jones)
- [cryptography] The Compromised Internet
  - From: [email protected] (Eugen Leitl)
- [cryptography] The Compromised Internet
  - From: [email protected] (coderman)

Prev by Date: [cryptography] The Compromised Internet
Next by Date: The Unbreakable Cipher (2)
Previous by thread: [cryptography] The Compromised Internet
Next by thread: Fwd: [cryptography] The Compromised Internet
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread