[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[8] code observatory
- To: brian carroll <[email protected]>
- Subject: [8] code observatory
- From: [email protected] (Andy Isaacson)
- Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 16:58:47 -0700
- Cc: [email protected]
- In-reply-to: <CADhsnxceDEfKEKp03wUWAxnQRRtRiFLvoE38irfo159mR4==eQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CADhsnxdCcaFQytWZBg=Xw8ik=EjQpnHOOPMMoyMLBE4Gk-rw3Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CADhsnxceDEfKEKp03wUWAxnQRRtRiFLvoE38irfo159mR4==eQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 06:03:25PM -0500, brian carroll wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Andy Isaacson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 07:08:58PM -0500, brian carroll wrote:
> > > --- continued... ---
> >
> > Do you really believe that the 55,000 words you've posted to the list
> > over the last two weeks, with exactly one reply, is considered a
> > valuable contribution by other list members?
>
> are you the fuckhead who BSOD my computer
> and took it down after my first cypherpunks post?
No, I'm not.
> (if you are you better watch out- you're in trouble...)
Your threats and crude language don't make me think that I should bother
reading anything else you post.
Also, it's impolite to re-CC the list when I specifically didn't post my
reply to the list. Doing so merely to threaten me is ... amusingly
misguided.
-andy