[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Linux 5.0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. F2FS vs. XFS
- Subject: [ale] Linux 5.0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. F2FS vs. XFS
- From: DJPfulio at jdpfu.com (DJ-Pfulio)
- Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 20:56:30 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
F2FS did well in that comparison. Surprising.
Been using ext4 for almost everything for years. Sometimes being able
to reduce a file system is handy.
When I learned that btrfs lied to df and du, I was out.
On 1/9/19 8:41 PM, Raj Wurttemberg via Ale wrote:
> I saw that you all were talking about the BTRFS file system and remembered
> this article from a few days ago. I build and maintain large SAP HANA
> database servers (physical and virtual) so my only choice is the XFS file
> system which we have been quite happy with.
>
> Anyway... Interesting read.... :)
>
> Linux 5.0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. EXT4 vs. F2FS vs. XFS
>
> https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux-50-filesystems&num
> =1