[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Ouch
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 10:24:07PM -0500, Raj Wurttemberg via Ale wrote:
> Ohh.. yeah... Ouch!! A 30% performance hit?!?!
It's actually not _that_ bad -- it's a significant performance hit on
making system calls -- the only measurements I've seen have shown a 38%
increase in the overhead to read() --actual processing is unaffected.
On the other hand, I/O intensive workloads are the most heavily
impacted. The PostgreSQL folks have done some preliminary benchmarks
and it's not pretty:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20180102222354.qikjmf7dvnjgbkxe at alap3.anarazel.de
- Solomon
--
Solomon Peachy pizza at shaftnet dot org
Coconut Creek, FL ^^ (email/xmpp) ^^
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20180103/5754eae5/attachment.sig>
- Follow-Ups:
- [ale] Ouch
- From: jim.kinney at gmail.com (Jim Kinney)
- References:
- [ale] Ouch
- From: agcarver+ale at acarver.net (Alex Carver)
- [ale] Ouch
- From: rajaw at c64.us (Raj Wurttemberg)