[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] systemd bad. Very bad.

Subject: [ale] systemd bad. Very bad.
From: joey at joeykelly.net (Joey Kelly)
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 14:51:23 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 01:25:31PM -0500, Joey Kelly wrote:
>> One more in a long list of reasons why systemd is a horrible and risky
>> proposition: putting DNS resolution in your init system:
>
> You're right; putting DNS resolution into your init system is a horrible
> idea.  Fortunately, no init systems -- systemd included -- do that.
>
> You have a lot more to learn.
>
>  - Solomon

systemd claims to be an init system. systemd-resolved is part of systemd.
I guess I do have a lot more to learn.


-- 
Joey Kelly
Minister of the Gospel and Linux Consultant
http://joeykelly.net
504-239-6550

Follow-Ups:
- [ale] systemd bad. Very bad.
  - From: JLightner at dsservices.com (Lightner, Jeffrey)
- [ale] systemd bad. Very bad.
  - From: slitt at troubleshooters.com (Steve Litt)

References:
- [ale] systemd bad. Very bad.
  - From: joey at joeykelly.net (Joey Kelly)
- [ale] systemd bad. Very bad.
  - From: pizza at shaftnet.org (Solomon Peachy)

Prev by Date: [ale] systemd bad. Very bad.
Next by Date: [ale] systemd bad. Very bad.
Previous by thread: [ale] systemd bad. Very bad.
Next by thread: [ale] systemd bad. Very bad.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread