[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] OT: Ethernet wiring
- Subject: [ale] OT: Ethernet wiring
- From: jim.kinney at gmail.com (Jim Kinney)
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 16:09:07 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CABo2fvBu9TnWwo8hVRhKH2AFBfH9Uc5OKOOo0TdZ0yiSHVTMwA@mail.gmail.com> <CABo2fvAZZa6rXp3JVbzcVO-VY6i=c+5_3po5FZ-oG+_fNqJhkw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAEo=5PxQmeGbfEvSA2DcE24cToFzS1_Zy_riPzHNMcoh60MOQQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
feet. meters. Is there really a difference?
And yes. It should be 100M or 300 feet for the long runs and 1/10 the
distance for the higher speed.
On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 14:39 -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 01:08:59PM -0400, Jim Kinney wrote:
> > > > Cat6 will do 10G for short runs under 10 meters. The Cat6e is 10G
for the
> > full run of 300 meters.
> > Cat5e will do 1G for 300 meters.
> > Cat5 is 100M for 300m and 1G for 10m.
>
> Perhaps you meant 300 feet, not meters???(well, 328 to be precise)
>
> > Ethernet over twisted-pair is only spec'd for 100 meters. It's not
just?
> a matter of signal integrity (though higher quality cable certianly?
> > helps) but beyond 100 meters the propogation delay exceeds the
timing?
> allowances in the low-level link layer protocol.
>
> ?- Solomon
--?
James P. Kinney III
Every time you stop a school, you will have to build a jail. What you
gain at one end you lose at the other. It's like feeding a dog on his
own tail. It won't fatten the dog.
- Speech 11/23/1900 Mark Twain
http://heretothereideas.blogspot.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20160719/a835d778/attachment.html>