[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] LTS doesn't always mean LTS
- Subject: [ale] LTS doesn't always mean LTS
- From: jhubbslist at att.net (Jeff Hubbs)
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:55:40 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAAt=rgDNyVyxL2am9hAR5VM8RFhum5Pnc6RqFAKva1+0YTSr6Q@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAAt=rgC8EeSi=t6RZ3ruTN_3G9nYzwdzV-Y8554tbqKjdEwRdA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAAt=rgDNyVyxL2am9hAR5VM8RFhum5Pnc6RqFAKva1+0YTSr6Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 4/27/16 8:22 AM, James Sumners wrote:
>
> If you're willing to use a moving target, then go to the source and
> use Debian's testing tree. Or Arch. Or Void. Or, and I can't believe
> I'm saying this one, Gentoo.
And remember that you can choose to have Gentoo move as little as you
want, although if you really want to run a museum piece you'll need to
maintain your own distfiles repository; they do prune out really old
versions of packages.