[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] Apt vs apt-get: was LTS doesn't always mean LTS

Subject: [ale] Apt vs apt-get: was LTS doesn't always mean LTS
From: preston.lists at gmail.com (Preston)
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 14:29:48 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <CAEo=5Pz+7pq33PqrBUiHJRdOw4bnJMp_71Hv=rZZEc-d9JO81A@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAOy4Vzcn27ENkkjoFSd+QjmKP0z+a8J2z7astbv4dF9n+LKp3g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAAt=rgC2wTL0si=W2dG3M1V=6mPEOBGSvRkkq8an-9=xQd_=VA@mail.gmail.com> <CABmokzAmUQd3Kjs86sQdUADqkyb9LW+nEPNAp=Ox6vBGc=RuEQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

On 4/26/2016 1:21 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 12:20:12 -0400
> dev null zero two <dev.null.02 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> just an aside, DJ: I'm pretty sure "apt" has superseded aptitude _and_
>> apt-get now.
> 
> Where does one find good, accurate and understandable documentation on
> apt?
> 
> SteveT
> 
> Steve Litt 
> April 2016 featured book: Rapid Learning for the 21st Century
> http://www.troubleshooters.com/rl21

The Debian Administrator's Handbook is one place:
https://debian-handbook.info/browse/stable/apt.html

Preston
-- 
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don?t
matter and those who matter don?t mind.
-Dr. Seuss

Follow-Ups:
- [ale] Apt vs apt-get: was LTS doesn't always mean LTS
  - From: bamakojeff at gmail.com (Jeff Jansen)

References:
- [ale] LTS doesn't always mean LTS
  - From: djpfulio at jdpfu.com (DJ-Pfulio)
- [ale] LTS doesn't always mean LTS
  - From: jim.kinney at gmail.com (Jim Kinney)
- [ale] LTS doesn't always mean LTS
  - From: ale_nospam at fayettedigital.com (Jim Lynch)
- [ale] LTS doesn't always mean LTS
  - From: DJPfulio at jdpfu.com (DJ-Pfulio)
- [ale] LTS doesn't always mean LTS
  - From: david at systemoverlord.com (David Tomaschik)
- [ale] Spam: Re: LTS doesn't always mean LTS
  - From: DJPfulio at jdpfu.com (DJ-Pfulio)
- [ale] Spam: Re: LTS doesn't always mean LTS
  - From: james.sumners at gmail.com (James Sumners)
- [ale] Spam: Re: LTS doesn't always mean LTS
  - From: dev.null.02 at gmail.com (dev null zero two)
- [ale] Apt vs apt-get: was LTS doesn't always mean LTS
  - From: slitt at troubleshooters.com (Steve Litt)

Prev by Date: [ale] Spam: Re: LTS doesn't always mean LTS
Next by Date: [ale] Apt vs apt-get: was LTS doesn't always mean LTS
Previous by thread: [ale] Apt vs apt-get: was LTS doesn't always mean LTS
Next by thread: [ale] Apt vs apt-get: was LTS doesn't always mean LTS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread