[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] LTS doesn't always mean LTS
- Subject: [ale] LTS doesn't always mean LTS
- From: bugyatl at gmail.com (Boris Borisov)
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 15:38:17 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAAt=rgCf+8E9kiAG=vjV2UT8TwrmwXNaS6az0T+v-1Esm0aS1A@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAAt=rgC8EeSi=t6RZ3ruTN_3G9nYzwdzV-Y8554tbqKjdEwRdA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAAt=rgBu95rGoc4z+m5Q5Dr7aUNDOHQ=R+Xk_n9ANrLFb+g5ng@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAAt=rgCf+8E9kiAG=vjV2UT8TwrmwXNaS6az0T+v-1Esm0aS1A@mail.gmail.com>
Isn't " use on your own risk" implied with Linux software. I don't know
about a OS company "put whatever giant's name here" to sign under several
thousands packages.
On Monday, April 25, 2016, James Sumners <james.sumners at gmail.com> wrote:
> Nope. I meant it just as I wrote it. It had not other meaning. But you
> can read it however you like. I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Jerald Sheets <questy at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Except the little statement ?people with a clue?? implying anyone using
> the
> > product must NOT have a clue. It is indeed insulting.
> >
> >
> > On Apr 25, 2016, at 12:26 PM, James Sumners <james.sumners at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I wasn't. Except to the distro.
> >
> > On Monday, April 25, 2016, Todor Fassl <fassl.tod at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> No need to be insulting, guy.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 04/25/2016 08:21 AM, James Sumners wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Why Ubuntu is used by people with a clue is beyond me. Well, except to
> >>> throw it at a family member who doesn't have one. But this even makes
> >>> that seem like a silly notion. There are better distributions out
> >>> there. Some even forked from Ubuntu.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 9:02 AM, DJ-Pfulio <djpfulio at jdpfu.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> In Ubuntu LTS, there's an issue with many packages not receiving
> >>>> security updates.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://www.wilderssecurity.com/threads/ubuntu-lts-many-vulnerabilities-despite-long-term-support.385386/
> >>>> ====
> >>>> $ ubuntu-support-status --show-unsupported
> >>>> Support status summary of 'lubuntu':
> >>>>
> >>>> You have 196 packages (8.0%) supported until February 2015 (9m)
> >>>> You have 12 packages (0.5%) supported until January 2017 (9m)
> >>>> You have 1679 packages (68.8%) supported until May 2019 (5y)
> >>>> You have 148 packages (6.1%) supported until May 2017 (3y)
> >>>>
> >>>> You have 101 packages (4.1%) that can not/no-longer be downloaded
> >>>> You have 304 packages (12.5%) that are unsupported
> >>>>
> >>>> No longer downloadable:
> >>>> <insert huge-ass-list> .......
> >>>>
> >>>> Unsupported:
> >>>> <insert even-huger-huge-ass-list> ...
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20160425/1ff8faaf/attachment.html>