[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] Buwahahah! This is great

Subject: [ale] Buwahahah! This is great
From: mike at trausch.us (Michael Trausch)
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 22:01:49 -0400
In-reply-to: <CAJj_f=Wqh9n+90fNYbO8dR8y2wbd3u8XV_61mSRttyPzqNLE3Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADT30qVMqe5VDLb_Zgoc-4gAc92TUhYZYsrmDQG+_zJ=axeGeA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CADT30qVYU4eHj0nhm4FY9RxEKTDQ2wQzRMNZJ-u8CQ1DWWUahQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAMdBqcMN+Eg6JbwEkP+ayrWqU+1d6Zv7ZtgToATk+=L9Bp=cMg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAJj_f=Wqh9n+90fNYbO8dR8y2wbd3u8XV_61mSRttyPzqNLE3Q@mail.gmail.com>

My misunderstanding was that the circuit ruling was upheld, not pending certiorari. 

Sent from my iPad

> On May 29, 2015, at 8:03 PM, Robert Slaughter <robert.s.slaughter at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> SCOTUS has not yet made a decision; this is an amicus brief by the DOJ in support of one side.

References:
- [ale] Buwahahah! This is great
  - From: hooterpincher at gmail.com (Charles Shapiro)
- [ale] Buwahahah! This is great
  - From: mike at trausch.us (Michael Trausch)
- [ale] Buwahahah! This is great
  - From: hooterpincher at gmail.com (Charles Shapiro)
- [ale] Buwahahah! This is great
  - From: mike at trausch.us (Michael Trausch)
- [ale] Buwahahah! This is great
  - From: pete.hardie at gmail.com (Pete Hardie)
- [ale] Buwahahah! This is great
  - From: mike at trausch.us (Michael Trausch)
- [ale] Buwahahah! This is great
  - From: robert.s.slaughter at gmail.com (Robert Slaughter)

Prev by Date: [ale] Buwahahah! This is great
Next by Date: [ale] Buwahahah! This is great
Previous by thread: [ale] Buwahahah! This is great
Next by thread: [ale] Buwahahah! This is great
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread