[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] RH Satellite 6 moron's intro?
- Subject: [ale] RH Satellite 6 moron's intro?
- From: jdp at algoloma.com (JD)
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:03:49 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAAt=rgBFqnfm32jerxdUmqMrJdiFkeBWP7jAHzZb+U0CC7ALOw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAAt=rgB_DGJwr7QcgcMvCAKpb2skupo5otgGZp+KY7531wTFig@mail.gmail.com> <CAMcVf+oOnHNA169HPQ9xqMJQr3WgFtN3ZLoEzGeatBU7G7zEYg@mail.gmail.com> <CAAt=rgD+QNfHJXrMEuYFF4YNDovV_2S9a27PB3=PBnmoGH9=ZA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAt=rgDGOR+PEoRt89ypwa4Na+F48mZnP0tLAMFCBcwQdShCNQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAAt=rgAmZau1QdcK5jpzTMMC-M_9FFGMknj+3H_Cx4TVzDtwig@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAAt=rgBFqnfm32jerxdUmqMrJdiFkeBWP7jAHzZb+U0CC7ALOw@mail.gmail.com>
But, but, but that isn't "agile!"
On 01/21/2015 05:52 PM, James Sumners wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, January 21, 2015, Scott McBrien <smcbrien at gmail.com
> <mailto:smcbrien at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> It's a brand new product and .0 release. Expecting it to be unflawed is a
> fallacy.
>
>
> Should I expect the installation instructions to work for a "release worthy"
> product? I sure as hell think so.
>
> I also expect the documentation to thoroughly cover something that is completely
> different than the last version. Especially when it is mashing together so many
> disparate technologies that may or may not work together (and probably haven't
> been used before by people who use the Satellite product).
>
> I ended up wiping it out and installing it fresh for a third time today. Each
> time was different. So far, this time has worked better than the previous
> attempts. But there are still BIG gaps between what is in the doc, the knowledge
> the doc should be imparting, and what shows up on screen.
>
>
>
--
JD Pflugrath
Value | Results
Direct: +001.678.685.8882
Ofc: 1.866.963.2546
Managing Director
Algoloma Systems, LLC