[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] [OT] FCC and Net Neutrality and Verizon's response
- Subject: [ale] [OT] FCC and Net Neutrality and Verizon's response
- From: michaeldnolan at gmail.com (Michael Nolan)
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 17:29:55 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAMdBqcMSonpLQJWinPTpyCZt6-UN6N=gw6+oGuiMNyD1HzwUXg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAEo=5Pw8jSrnaRneQYPhzEPdzJToGyS-TLUxhJcT3wLdKLGOYw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMdBqcMSonpLQJWinPTpyCZt6-UN6N=gw6+oGuiMNyD1HzwUXg@mail.gmail.com>
Regardless of your stance on "Net Neutrality" (whatever that is...)
allowing the appointed commissions to implement secret regulations is
stupid.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Pete Hardie <pete.hardie at gmail.com> wrote:
> If they don't like the 1930's law on telephony, perhaps we should use the
> 1890's law against monopolies on them?
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Jim Kinney <jim.kinney at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Apparently, using a law from the 1930's is viewed as bad by the crowd
>> that want's to find ways to weasel more money out of the Internet access we
>> already pay dearly for. So in response to ISP's being classified as Title
>> II "common carriers", Verizon published their opinion of the new ruling in
>> Morse Code.
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20150226/7c3be1e8/attachment.html>