[ale] systemd or not

[james.sumners at gmail.com (James Sumners)]

I would. As I said in my original reply in this thread -- you either adopt
systemd to run the newest versions of GNOME or you don't get GNOME. That's
why this BSD project exists, to add support for a system they do not want
just so they can continue to use a desktop manager. It is a completely
ludicrous situation that a specific system I it manager is required to use
a desktop environment.

On Monday, September 8, 2014, Michael B. Trausch <mike at trausch.us> wrote:

> On 09/08/2014 10:14 AM, Jerald Sheets wrote:
>
>> Haven?t been able to read all the messages, but here?s the latex on the
>> BSD front regarding SystemD?.  Maybe you BSD folks won?t be safe from the
>> systems onslaught after all?
>>
>
> I am not at all surprised.  The BSDs have for a long time included Linux
> API/ABI emulation.  I won't be surprised if we wind up seeing one of the
> BSDs actually adopting systemd and using it as a measurement of their Linux
> emulation.  :-)
>
>     ? Mike
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo
>


-- 
James Sumners
http://james.roomfullofmirrors.com/

"All governments suffer a recurring problem: Power attracts pathological
personalities. It is not that power corrupts but that it is magnetic to the
corruptible. Such people have a tendency to become drunk on violence, a
condition to which they are quickly addicted."

Missionaria Protectiva, Text QIV (decto)
CH:D 59
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20140908/2d1dd272/attachment.html>