[ale] intel math error, or "Hurry up with glibc 2.19"

[bugyatl at gmail.com (Boris Borisov)]

That I guess is addressed only for Intel. I have several SOC with math
software EMU. I wonder what the result are in these aka how good is the
math emulator in linix kernel.

On Saturday, October 11, 2014, Jim Kinney <jim.kinney at gmail.com> wrote:

> Next glibc (v.2.19) has some better math in it that won't rely on Intel's
> bad math.
>
>
> http://randomascii.wordpress.com/2014/10/09/intel-underestimates-error-bounds-by-1-3-quintillion/
>
> --
> --
> James P. Kinney III
>
> Every time you stop a school, you will have to build a jail. What you gain
> at one end you lose at the other. It's like feeding a dog on his own tail.
> It won't fatten the dog.
> - Speech 11/23/1900 Mark Twain
>
>
> *http://heretothereideas.blogspot.com/
> <http://heretothereideas.blogspot.com/>*
>


-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20141011/5df8d16c/attachment.html>