[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] xfs vs. ext4
- Subject: [ale] xfs vs. ext4
- From: pizza at shaftnet.org (Solomon Peachy)
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 13:04:32 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAPfJb3p2qMig+vwvaAGXK57=h3YSVwQ7OaixnLGaSWLeOHpN9w@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAPfJb3p2qMig+vwvaAGXK57=h3YSVwQ7OaixnLGaSWLeOHpN9w@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 10:19:47AM -0500, Chuck Payne wrote:
> I have notices that both openSUSE and CentOS 7 have move away from ext4 as
> the default filesystem to XFS, any reason why?
>
> What does XFS give that ext4 doesn't?
In short, it scales much, much better, especially with server loads, but
also with the increasingly multi-threaded desktop loads of modern
systems.
It allows much (much!) larger filesystems than ext4 and you don't have
to wait a couple of hours to run disk consistency checks.
- Solomon
--
Solomon Peachy pizza at shaftnet dot org
Delray Beach, FL ^^ (email/xmpp) ^^
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 155 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20141105/b89b9480/attachment.sig>