[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Centos
- Subject: [ale] Centos
- From: jdp at algoloma.com (JD)
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 15:16:44 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAEo=5Pz6UxUwdRb6-deyTPkC1iEhRjd1+PjfZRy-Gt=o57Dg0w@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAEo=5PyO9k8Y7kVFxtSRRWX=2+U4QdnbfnEBW8byVv8oYB0=GA@mail.gmail.com> <CAEo=5PyEH4+_u-a5cJ8vShpg33G-Qvo+ptLnFmvOfUHVrfcieg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAEo=5Pz6UxUwdRb6-deyTPkC1iEhRjd1+PjfZRy-Gt=o57Dg0w@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/25/2014 02:57 PM, Jim Kinney wrote:
> XFS has been out of beta for 10 years. It's been an install option since
> RHEL5.
I've used XFS on Irix and for a short test on Linux in the early 2000s with a
multitude of different FS which shouldn't count. If it is the default for your
flavor, then i'd use it.
I made the mistake of using JFS for about a decade, prior to it being in the
base kernel. I've learned about the hassles of doing that and don't plan to make
that mistake again. Most of the save-your-butt utility disks aren't going to
support XFS, so if that is important to you, it is a consideration. OTOH, in a
work environment, that probably isn't normal.
XFS is NOT the default on all linuxen, but it is definitely more proven than btrfs.
I should point out that I'm very cautious - having switched to ext4 just 18
months ago.