[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] NUC vs. RPi mail server

Subject: [ale] NUC vs. RPi mail server
From: jdp at algoloma.com (JD)
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:20:56 -0500
In-reply-to: <1224073092.10389335.1418415216398.JavaMail.zimbra@outpostsentinel.com>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <1224073092.10389335.1418415216398.JavaMail.zimbra@outpostsentinel.com>

> 4.  Outsourced sending and receiving to a Zimbra provider.

You got Zimbra running on an Rpi?

I can't get it loaded on anything less than 1.5G of RAM, at least that seems to
be the min from the last time I loaded it.

OTOH, the features of Zimbra ARE VERY NICE - server-side filtering, especially.

Follow-Ups:
- [ale] NUC vs. RPi mail server
  - From: cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Chris Fowler)

References:
- [ale] NUC vs. RPi mail server
  - From: agcarver+ale at acarver.net (Alex Carver)
- [ale] NUC vs. RPi mail server
  - From: ale at horkan.net (Horkan Smith)
- [ale] NUC vs. RPi mail server
  - From: agcarver+ale at acarver.net (Alex Carver)
- [ale] NUC vs. RPi mail server
  - From: ted-lists at xy0.org (Ted W.)
- [ale] NUC vs. RPi mail server
  - From: cfowler at outpostsentinel.com (Chris Fowler)

Prev by Date: [ale] OT :Coffee maker hack
Next by Date: [ale] OT :Coffee maker hack
Previous by thread: [ale] NUC vs. RPi mail server
Next by thread: [ale] NUC vs. RPi mail server
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread