[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Debian fork thoughts?
- Subject: [ale] Debian fork thoughts?
- From: pizza at shaftnet.org (Solomon Peachy)
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 12:25:43 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CACv9p5rRqiUHSMnBSWvg5mWgrUtKsAkQR_=9q6FROWf-JJU1zA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CACv9p5pzh1E-8yV4K4782D9-3tfafYSuBcD=kuTmAfQ=S7_tAg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CACv9p5rRqiUHSMnBSWvg5mWgrUtKsAkQR_=9q6FROWf-JJU1zA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:42:40AM -0500, leam hall wrote:
> That does not make opinions like Solomon's wrong. I don't agree with
> it but we're fine with disagreement.
Yes indeed; We're free to differ in our opinions and experiences.
Personally, I feel that Linux (and its core tools) shouldn't hobble
itself to the least common denominator; it's long past the point of
being the scrappy underdog that has to chase the coattails of
BigUnix(tm). Now it's the other way around.
- Solomon
--
Solomon Peachy pizza at shaftnet dot org
Delray Beach, FL ^^ (email/xmpp) ^^
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 155 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20141203/3d722e66/attachment.sig>