[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Multiple NFS servers for the same mount point?
- Subject: [ale] Multiple NFS servers for the same mount point?
- From: jim.kinney at gmail.com (Jim Kinney)
- Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:29:29 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
I've seen it done with DRBD and a dns failover. Two servers in back channel
live sync with DRBD. Slave setup would fence and take over if master fell
down and fall back once master resynced and returned. Did need to use soft
mount and not hard.
On Oct 27, 2013 12:13 PM, "Leam Hall" <leamhall at gmail.com> wrote:
> I recall seeing a place use multiple NFS servers for the same mount point.
> That is, if NFS-1 is not available, then use NFS-2. However, I wasn't
> involved in the setup and am not sure if they were using Virtual IPs or if
> mount can actually have an "servera or serverb" option.
>
> What's the current best practice for setting up a shared filesystem with
> reliability, failover, and good replication? If distro matters, this is
> more towards Ubuntu.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Leam
>
> --
> http://31challenge.net
> http://31challenge.net/insight
> ______________________________**_________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/**listinfo/ale<http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale>
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/**listinfo<http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20131027/10f532a3/attachment.html>