[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] selective DNS server for DHCP clients?
- Subject: [ale] selective DNS server for DHCP clients?
- From: pete.hardie at gmail.com (Pete Hardie)
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 11:21:11 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAMdBqcPrmJofwHygaRc-WQptiUtdGb7GavN2sSwNfpdubn8oMQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPfJb3pL5BFerU2XMqwjTTqJquE+9YA2D8T=TKng30PBgBi9Kw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMdBqcNctOD3TyjYcVzkL+uVWpRw3ML5aU39tahk4YAVLAGXVg@mail.gmail.com> <CAEo=5PzgE+StEuWz0+py8do1-gWQpwO5BYMbuTcut__5YrvZdA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMdBqcM7gKmEfOudFEAvvpQVmV68f9NmoDrcDsu+h6Q5xQoirQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAEo=5PzVwo5SgYLjCpXvfK9xHqqZvu2y-+OYvSjOcL3rUUzXfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMdBqcP6o7F8fa_8rxYW0VSAWnTUzk09bFNN1AJEG640b_mUmQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAMdBqcMbN=V62geYbDDUyw6BBZs-n1w3Y8Qn7SLjXPSND_3Yuw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
Yeah, that's the plan, but I want to take it one stp at a time. I've lived
through a few too many "change everything in one fell swoop" incidents that
turned into "Aggh! Which thing broke it?"
Pete Hardie
--------
Better Living Through Bitmaps
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Alex Carver <agcarver+ale at acarver.net>wrote:
> On 3/6/2013 19:27, Pete Hardie wrote:
>
>> A followup, for those interested in the results
>>
>> I think that I have found a working configuration. I currently have dhcpd
>> running, supplying a few fixed IPs for my DVRs, and pointing them at my
>> WIRNS server for replacement guide data, and I was able to set up another
>> MAC-specific stanza to point
>> my Nook to use my desktop as its DNS, which is handled by dnsmasq. I set
>> up dnsmasq to map reddit.com to 127.0.0.1 and it appears to do what I
>> want
>> - fail to load that site.
>>
>> I could use dnsmasq to supply the DHCP, and may switch to that once I feel
>> that everything else is working totally to my satisfaction
>>
>> Thanks again to all for the suggestions and war stories about blocking
>> your
>> kids' access!
>>
>
> Switching to dnsmasq will make a lot of stuff easier for you in the end.
> You can still map IP to MACs so DHCP assignments end up being static. You
> can also send all of the optional DHCP assignments to different clients on
> a per client basis (using packet tagging) which means you can do things
> like auto-configure proxy services via the DHCP options headers. Plus it's
> only one program to maintain instead of two. :)
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/**listinfo/ale<http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale>
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
> http://mail.ale.org/mailman/**listinfo<http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20130308/22c5e89d/attachment-0001.html>