[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] networking backpressure
- Subject: [ale] networking backpressure
- From: nym.bnm at gmail.com (Brian MacLeod)
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:47:17 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAEo=5Px=ioVm2J+zfZbOM=GX1ULE2nHDbMejD5KVjtpzFQvJ2g@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAEo=5PyotVjpfRh1gLf8pbvvANMbdByOvzfmnmR3+Azuvr27Rw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAPfJb3qyw1T0vtbXOPUYPFHHOffKdXTbAMD=iAvWQ5qj6q1rBg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAEo=5PxiSUZGi8GSKPEbyrJ9bpcBZBA0TRY9_ODBvvDUF9dJ-Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAEo=5Px=ioVm2J+zfZbOM=GX1ULE2nHDbMejD5KVjtpzFQvJ2g@mail.gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 4/10/13 1:25 PM, Jim Kinney wrote:
> ZoL with CentOS 6.4
>
> If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room!
>
We're about to give ZoL on RHEL6.4 a go ourselves. We have a special
use case that will just happen to provide us a comparison to:
1) NFSv3 tcp on Linux (v3 because of RHEL5 v4 problems...another story)
2) Solaris 10 ZFS/NFS
If ZoL can get above 60% of the performance, we're going to have to
seriously consider an infrastructure change, because trying to
perpetuate our Solaris management into OpenIndiana will probably be
painful...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQE4BAEBCAAiBQJRZaWlGxhoa3A6Ly9rZXlzZXJ2ZXIudWJ1bnR1LmNvbQAKCRD5
XCJY/q4Y6DAWB/4oTGn01DO4EK2r3x1e/r5J8Crc/HJwxqkXW6eIcR8MqJILSL9P
bq6xXNeGmIbUU9OqcossoijkrVdRwGma4EV/v+fEG41mNMgNVOC5vh+oxTRJPRLP
fdH/qV5PtTY4VIqBm4fMlGPeBw2Q2HUygXDfZEWX4Upbqyi7068jeNt3FzEoEdMT
Vr4GCS12uCBABf1wg3mV+HrNKmEhz6HanlnYYHfkgQutq+1bp0NieQldcZzWLJLI
VfUAu7PvkR/vG5+wnll3IIuSdVCBHtk7Odj4DVQoTU4IhzdZf+3dOKKcDYV9Gf2d
Ml/ah1S/6PN0HrFMTVfipkq0SJ7+BcWEGsdi
=HHIO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----