[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Source for Inexpensive, Quiet, Low-Power, rackmount server?
- Subject: [ale] Source for Inexpensive, Quiet, Low-Power, rackmount server?
- From: jdp at algoloma.com (JD)
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:19:43 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
On 10/16/2012 11:52 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking to offload my MySQL server off my MythTV hardware and onto
> its own server box. This instance of MySQL handles not only MythTV data
> but also my Maia Mailguard, Zarafa, Gallery, and possibly other
> services.
No. Recording TV takes more CPU that you'd expect. If you add in transcoding,
you'll need at least a Core2Duo CPU.
If you remove the TV recording and transcoding, then an Atom-level box would be
fine.
> I'd like something relatively quiet because it's living in my house, not
> in some rackspace machine room. I'd prefer to have 8GB of ram but all
> the Atom boxes I've found seem to max out at 4 (although I can aquire
> one for about $450 with an D2500HN Atom Dual Core 1.86GHz/4GB/160GB 5400RPM).
You can build an Atom-base (or AMD E-something) for less than $200 with 4GB of
RAM and a picoPSU (100% silent PSU). There is no need for even 4GB of RAM to run
all those things, including Zarafa. Running the enterprise email process on
there makes 1-2GB needed, but everything else will fit in 512MB. If you use
straight postfix and dovecot, the email part will easily fit in 384MB - easily.
This assumes no more than 10 email users. 4G is fine. Don't know anything
about mailguard requirements.
> Has anyone found any good sources for inexpensive servers?
When they call something a "server", add $200-$5000 to the real price. I've
found some newegg APU + steel case bundles for Atom-class systems and cases for
$100. $30 for 4GB of RAM and $50 for the picoPSU, reuse an old HDD and you are
golden for $180. No transcoding or TV tuner. For the TV tuners, I love the
network-baed HDHR models. Then it doesn't matter where the recording happens on
your network. I record using a virtual machine.
> I was also considering an SSD for this application. Do you experts feel
> that would help my application speeds?
No, not at all, but others will have a completely different take. Video
streaming does not demand the costs that an SSD requires. A large HDD is more
important, it doesn't need to be fast.
If you want a TV tuner and transcoding, you can find used (off lease) C2D boxes
for about $200, but the PSU will probably be too noisy for a living room
environment.
I'd avoid the entire "server" line, unless you are just trying to get something
that looks cool and different for the house.
- Prev by Date:
[ale] OT converting old videos, cataloging dvds, storing forever
- Next by Date:
[ale] OT converting old videos, cataloging dvds, storing forever
- Previous by thread:
[ale] Source for Inexpensive, Quiet, Low-Power, rackmount server?
- Next by thread:
[ale] Source for Inexpensive, Quiet, Low-Power, rackmount server?
- Index(es):