[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] Video Resolutions
- Subject: [ale] Video Resolutions
- From: charriglists at bellsouth.net (Calvin Harrigan)
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:56:36 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAFc0yP1tAVoMv2y=X6fdz_nvGeU2q67bHfF0p4H4Xiq_c8Bz-A@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CAFc0yP1tAVoMv2y=X6fdz_nvGeU2q67bHfF0p4H4Xiq_c8Bz-A@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/26/2012 10:43 AM, Brian Stanaland wrote:
> I know what you mean. Flat panels seem to max out at 1920x1080 AKA
> 1080p(or i). I had a 15inch Toshiba years ago with a 1600x1200 display.
> I want that again. I know with wide screens it would be 1920x1200 but
> that'd be great!
>
> Brian
>
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Chris Fowler
> <cfowler at outpostsentinel.com <mailto:cfowler at outpostsentinel.com>> wrote:
>
> After installing a (new to me) workstation I started looking for a new
> LCD. Currently I am using an Acer 21" wide screen. I started looking
> at 27", but I'm confused about resolutions. I need as many pixels on
> the screen as I can get. The more I get the more stuff I can view
> without scrolling. What I do not understand is why as LCD screens get
> larger the resolutions do not. The resolution difference between my 21
> and the Acer 27 is not that great. I'm just curious what I can't get a
> LCD with a 3K+x3k+ resolution.
<Snip>
You can buy 16:10 1920x1200 screens that tend to be based on IPS
technologies. They are very expensive. Something like this:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824001540