[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] OT: Does involve Linus

Subject: [ale] OT: Does involve Linus
From: michael.campbell at gmail.com (Michael Campbell)
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:56:32 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAKtB=OAitemnQdb0YcoJNteRP9MgLsbZJz2DZCrrBKEAUgxwCw@mail.gmail.com> <CAAU2Bpbyt_nzL0TJDdCqB4UbEL0CoGScEwBfQuY3iQAz3D829Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAKtB=ODuNwf+4a4v1c4Ffor3A8PThDh1gTQPmx1uttBvin=FGw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Lightner, Jeff <JLightner at water.com>wrote:

>   Maybe if they called the OS Gnunix instead of Linux Linus would be more
> likely to decry the name?
>

Anything's possible.

Or, gnu could finish Hurd and let Lin* go its own way.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20120625/673e73d0/attachment.html

References:
- [ale] OT: Does involve Linus
  - From: skotchman at gmail.com (Scott Castaline)
- [ale] OT: Does involve Linus
  - From: ted at techmachine.net (Ted W)
- [ale] OT: Does involve Linus
  - From: michael.campbell at gmail.com (Michael Campbell)
- [ale] OT: Does involve Linus
  - From: justgold79 at gmail.com (Justin Goldberg)
- [ale] OT: Does involve Linus
  - From: michael.campbell at gmail.com (Michael Campbell)
- [ale] OT: Does involve Linus
  - From: JLightner at water.com (Lightner, Jeff)

Prev by Date: [ale] OT: Does involve Linus
Next by Date: [ale] Upgrading from svn 1.6.18 to 1.7.x on Fedora
Previous by thread: [ale] OT: Does involve Linus
Next by thread: [ale] gpg: BAD signature
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread