[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] [OT] AT&T/UVerse going to carrier grade NAT?
- Subject: [ale] [OT] AT&T/UVerse going to carrier grade NAT?
- From: jdp at algoloma.com (JD)
- Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 13:53:46 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAKtB=OAGG7gdr2Yxs0TxCxchtE3gf6LvYUBqYdJr1BNkBiGynA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAKtB=OA6NANEjuZe9i5CuDPN6Ygcy9w4bP18hqsn9NGGJJFS5g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
On 06/07/2012 11:54 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> I didn't even think about UVerse because nowhere on their website do
> they ever mention upstream bandwidth numbers. They talk about various
> download speeds, but never upstream. If an ISP can't even be bothered
> to talk about bi-directional speeds then I can't be bothered to consider
> giving them business.
I was pulling a almost a thousand vacation photos from a friend on uVerse a few
weeks ago and never saw more than 400Kbps. Accessing his network has always
sucked - he hates Comcast more than he hates slow DSL.
When I push similar data to him over Comcast (same endpoints), it is usually
1.5-2Mbps.
Just sayin'.