[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] [OT] AT&T/UVerse going to carrier grade NAT?
- Subject: [ale] [OT] AT&T/UVerse going to carrier grade NAT?
- From: michael.campbell at gmail.com (Michael Campbell)
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 13:44:14 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <CAKtB=OAGG7gdr2Yxs0TxCxchtE3gf6LvYUBqYdJr1BNkBiGynA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAKtB=OA6NANEjuZe9i5CuDPN6Ygcy9w4bP18hqsn9NGGJJFS5g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Ron Frazier (ALE) <
atllinuxenthinfo at techstarship.com> wrote:
> Would dynamic dns service in conjunction with something like a hotspotvpn
> tunnel allow you to expose services to the internet? I think you have a
> "public" address as long as the tunnel is up. Of course, they may not want
> you to keep the tunnel up 24 hr / day.
>
That's where I was heading; a ssh connection from my home server to some
externally-visible machine, and doing a reverse tunnel through that.
The trick is figuring out how to run a dyn-dns-update client from whatever
externally visible machine I am ssh'ing to. There are such things
available (https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DynamicDNS), so I'm not overly
concerned about it yet. And it might be time to start seriously
considering using a commercial VPN service and using that as my entry point
"back" to my home-server. (Is that even possible?)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.ale.org/pipermail/ale/attachments/20120607/d0caea97/attachment-0001.html