[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] [OT] Getting into forensic work
- Subject: [ale] [OT] Getting into forensic work
- From: ale_nospam at fayettedigital.com (Jim Lynch)
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 19:47:03 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAMBGJbEXEL7Yf4wWhe2uDGkd=amqNYka6KTFv+zcj2kkamk2Gg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAMBGJbEJOmyo3xSAt=i+kswvQsT8Tv8Fb5e6QPMys-T-0rY77A@mail.gmail.com> <CAMBGJbEXEL7Yf4wWhe2uDGkd=amqNYka6KTFv+zcj2kkamk2Gg@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/10/2012 01:38 PM, Michael Trausch wrote:
> To be a bit better about it: a credential, used in a court case, is
> seen as satisfactory proof of competency. I think that is probably a
> bad idea as it only proves that the person passed as competent at some
> point in the past. A person should have to actually prove their
> competence on a case-by-case basis, instead of the judge telling the
> jury that a credential is proof positive itself. Just my two cents,
> though.
Where on earth did you get the idea that the practice of law involves
reason? ;-)
Jim.