[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ale] OT: man in the middle on diebold machines

Subject: [ale] OT: man in the middle on diebold machines
From: david at systemoverlord.com (David Tomaschik)
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:03:30 -0400
In-reply-to: <CAF3r3HW96qfSzQmujuR2HF-xQnMESEzeo6BpKurtDDYwaWKAKg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]> <CAF3r3HW96qfSzQmujuR2HF-xQnMESEzeo6BpKurtDDYwaWKAKg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Cameron Kilgore <ghostfreeman at gmail.com> wrote:
> I still wonder the need to complicate and put at risk the reliability of our
> one measure of democracy. Paper ballots seem more reliable and less prone to
> a politician's whim.
> --Cameron

Exactly why the politicians want electronic voting.

</paranoia>



-- 
David Tomaschik, RHCE, LPIC-1
System Administrator/Open Source Advocate
OpenPGP: 0x5DEA789B
http://systemoverlord.com
david at systemoverlord.com

Follow-Ups:
- [ale] OT: man in the middle on diebold machines
  - From: JLightner at water.com (Lightner, Jeff)

References:
- [ale] OT: man in the middle on diebold machines
  - From: lists at serioustechnology.com (Geoffrey Myers)
- [ale] OT: man in the middle on diebold machines
  - From: ghostfreeman at gmail.com (Cameron Kilgore)

Prev by Date: [ale] OT: man in the middle on diebold machines
Next by Date: [ale] OT: man in the middle on diebold machines
Previous by thread: [ale] OT: man in the middle on diebold machines
Next by thread: [ale] OT: man in the middle on diebold machines
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread