[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] WooHoo!! PostgreSQL 9.1!
- Subject: [ale] WooHoo!! PostgreSQL 9.1!
- From: doughalldev at gmail.com (Doug Hall)
- Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:18:28 -0500
- In-reply-to: <CAJ+1ZCGJL_-VyHsxqA-N5n=Xz=vq0zFuqGuWXdLGBoVNxm-ZAg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAEo=5Pycw522PfdE9F24mCQ=ptmqtKbaqVQ9LSqdAQ0R-KLzPw@mail.gmail.com> <CALCrukijuoy8e_Q25gzAVModCD5xU0=b+eKQ5=KTWVR8yEC3iA@mail.gmail.com> <CAEo=5PwW3sjAHT4rQjo_1BY1CnBM7NgRHoujArWe8uT0UetHAw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAJ+1ZCGJL_-VyHsxqA-N5n=Xz=vq0zFuqGuWXdLGBoVNxm-ZAg@mail.gmail.com>
Oops. A few years ago, they based their prices directly on ORACLE's
pricing structure. This may have changed now. There's a customer
comment that says they're 1/6 of the price, but I haven't seen an
official statement that says that. Just look over their plans in the
"store" link.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Doug Hall <doughalldev at gmail.com> wrote:
> Mike, if you're specifically looking to move a current application
> away from ORACLE, then I recommend you look into EnterpriseDB
> <http://enterprisedb.com>. This company has taken PostgreSQL and made
> it as ORACLE compatible as possible. Their charges are exactly 1/6 of
> ORACLE's. You might save yourself a lot of time rewriting code.
> EnterpriseDB employs many regular committers to PostgreSQL.
>
> We do not use this company, but I did some research into them a few years back.
>
> Doug
>
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Mike Harrison <cluon at geeklabs.com> wrote:
>> The tone of your emails and the features touted by yourselves
>> and digging around the PostgreSQL website made me realize
>> that it was time to build a basic app, using PostgreSQL
>> and march down that road again to see where it goes.
>>
>> That road leads away from Oracle. :)
>